![]() ![]() Fabrication level models are not yet supposed to be included in a large scale coordination project. Regardless of how 'Great' your software solution is, doesn't stop idiots from misunderstanding its capacity. no-one at bentley nor the firms involved can stop this from happening. It appears that at around 1.3GB of information there are serious stability issues. ![]() I have the pleasure of working with a Microstation based Structural engineer, and a Bentley (yes multiple products) process engineer. Have you read my "ARC/hinese, ARK/orean" post in this blog? What do you think about it?Īnd the other, why MicroStation is still alive if there is AutoCAD? What will you say if there in Dubai your collaborators use Revit? Convince them to switch to AECOsim? And I think that now that we are talking about full 'AECO' proccess and not only about 'AE' (or 'A') I think it´s mandatory to share and live together. ![]() Any of these tools have to redesign its own place now. AECOsim? It seems designed for engineers that need a good construction tool.īut what´s the common point in that fast comparison? The verb: "seems". Revit? It seems very strong and easy for initial phases. Allplan? It seems working good for European design-build architects or engineers. What conclusion? Do you mean who is going to win in this battle? I think the BIM concept in itself leads to a no winnner at all (and perharps that´s the reason because coordinator tools like ProjectWise seems to have such strength).ĪrchiCAD? Seems to be good for European design architects. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |